blather
think_in_code
kingsuperspecial UnconditionalAcceptance love =
Life.findSomeoneRightForMe();

if (love == null){
throw new Exception("Cripes! I'm lonely");}
else{
Life.enjoyTheGreatestReward(love);} 		011010
...
Dafremen void main(void)
{
the_right_one = -1;

while( life && !love)
{
for( cur_chick=the_right_one+1; curchick != the_right_one ; cur_chick++)
{
results[cur_chick] = CheckHerOut(sincerity, intentions, motivations, aspirations, looks);

if( IsSheABitch(results[cur_chick]))
{
while(loneliness_excessive || horniness_excessive)
{
EnjoyCompany(cur_chick);
Update_Loneliness_Status();
Update_Horniness_Status();
}
}
else
{
the_right_one = cur_chick;
}
}

while( !(IsSheABitch(results[the_right_one])))
{
EnjoyTheGreatestReward((life & love));
results[the_right_one] = CheckHerOut(sincerity, intentions, motivations, aspirations, (looks/(years_together+1)));
}
}
exit(the_right_one);
} 		011010
...
jacksprat
cannot reference non-static method findSomeOneRightForMe from static context UnconditionalAcceptance KingSuperSpecial.java:2

unrealisticExpectationError must be caught or declared in the throws clause of this method KingSuperSpecial.java:4

cannot convert boolean to type object KingSuperSpecial.java:7

class KingSuperSpecial must be declared abstract. It does not implement void dontRunFromLife of superClass nobodyGetsOutOfHereAlive

type UnconditionalAceptance not found in package life 		011010
...
kingsuperspecial fuck!

dood - the story of my fucking life!

wait a second...

are you ME? 		011011
...
Dafremen Bug Fix:

/* 10-11-01 Changed curchick != the_right_one to cur_chick != the_right_one */

for( cur_chick=the_right_one+1; cur_chick != the_right_one ; cur_chick++) 		011011
...
Dafremen Bug Fix:

/* 10-11-01 Found that locating the_right_one confers immortality upon the application enduser if IsSheABitch() never returns true. */

/* Also removed a glitch that would have kept the enduser with the_right_one even if love reaches 0 */

/* Added a check for life into the happiness while loop as well as a check for love */

while( !(IsSheABitch(results[the_right_one]))&& (life & love)) 		011011
...
nocturnal maybe it's cuz I've been studying philosophy for hours now, but that all sounds pretty philosophical, daf. don't tell me you're a big thinker, are you? 011011
...
Dafremen Noc...next to you..I'm an absolutely enormous thinker. Course next to ME certain household appliances would be considered big thinkers, so I'm not sure where that puts either one of us.

Maybe it's just that I've been up all night typing and the bags under my eyes are starting to slap against my cheeks as my head nods into and out of consciousness.
print("How deep do our thoughts run?");

if( (toaster_thoughts daf_thoughts) && (daf_thoughts) = (noc_thoughts))
{
print("We're both dumb as stumps.");
}
else
{
print("We're both deep thinkers. Either that or we're both morons and one of us wrote this program.");
} 		011012
...
Dafremen /* 10-13-01 Bug Fix: Forgot that blather doesn't allow the use of greater or less than signs. Came up with a halfassed remedy because it's 2 in the morning and I'm old. */

extern int thought_results; /* Note...I HATE using externs gawd..why did I need this one? */
static int dafnoc_results = NO_RESULTS_READY;

Update_Thought_Results();

switch(thought_results)
{
case DAF_THOUGHTS_BIGGER_THAN_NOCS:
case DAF_THOUGHTS_EQUAL_TO_NOCS:
dafnoc_results = DAF_NOC_PLENTY_DUMB;
break;

default:
dafnoc_results = NO_DAF_NOC_RESULTS;
}

Get_Toaster_Thought_Results(&toaster_results);

switch(toaster_results)
{
case TOASTER_MORE_PENSIVE_THAN_DAF:
if(dafnoc_results == DAF_NOC_PLENTY_DUMB)
{
print("We're both dumb as stumps.");
break;
}
default:
print("We're both deep thinkers. Either that or we're both morons and one of us wrote this program.");
}
}

/* Note to Kss...yes...it's atrocious...sue me do0d. */ 		011012
...
nocturnal I resent that. 011013
what's it to you? blather
who go from