|
| |
on_initiating_sex
|
|
|
Bespeckled
|
Empowering.
Fun.
Must be in the mood.
Which may [happily] lead to trying out a new position.
Which may include standing against a lofted bed, one foot perched on the middle dresser drawer.
But not before undressing each other deliberately and seductively.
With the lights on.
With only sex and love on the mind.
|
041215
|
| |
... |
|
|
ivyducktwilightseto
|
A situation I have yet to experience...
I really can't figure it out. I just don't get sex. I have no desire to have sex and can think of no one that I would want to do such a thing with. I just don't get it.
Am I being ridiculous? Am I an idiot?
?Gay?
No, I have even thought that. Gay sex gives me the shivers more than straight sex.
??Asexual??
Now we're talkin'.
.
|
041216
|
| |
... |
|
|
Bespeckled
|
well, I'm not sexpert, but here are a couple of options:
1. You can't think of anyone you'd want to have sex with because you don't know anyone you'd want to have sex with, which is respectable.
2. You're asexual.
I suppose if you wanted to confirm the second, you could think back to all the times you've had sex fantasies, the important issue being whether you've had any at all. Also, I must warn you that if you are asexual, falling in love might be an issue someday as your partner, unless asexual themself, will probably want to have sex at some point.
Who knows about these things though.
|
041216
|
| |
... |
|
|
phil
|
I am failry asexual
|
041216
|
| |
... |
|
|
realistic optimist
|
well, our best scientific guess to date is that death is nature's tat for the sweet, sweet tit of sexual reproduction. what i mean is that sexual reproduction is nature's greatest invention, and death expectancy is nature's necessary backlash echo response. this is because mutation is evolution's agent, and sexual reproduction greatly increases mutation rate because of genetic material exchange and mixing,
not to mention the possibility of as many as 1,000,000 or more progeny from 2 instead of 2 from 1 as a result of each sexual "event." since this allows such proliferation of species, nature must counterbalance such a stacked hand for life with the inevitability of death. the early asexual organisms did not have a life expectancy, which is just a nice way of saying death expectancy. many of the earlier organisms are likely to still exist, barring some unfortunate circumstance, which you also can't count out. death is as detailed and thorough as life is flourishing. all we can figure out is: protein plus water plus an energy source equals life. tom robbins' theory regarding life being invented by water as a means to carry itself around has more of a ring of truth to it than most theories i've heard.
so, if you've learned to be asexual, have you learned to be immortal too?
|
041216
|
