|
sameolme
|
both words are meant to influence the listener through deceptive means.
1st the noun, cowards. this is a descriptive noun which was used to identify people who forcibly took control of commercial jets and flew them into buildings.
Ruthless fanatics maybe, but cowards,
I don't think so. Since the American people were understandably afraid after
9/11, this lie helped transfer that fear onto the "enemy".
Faceless is an interesting adjective to
use. By wiping the face off the "enemy", the listener is invited to put their own,probably subconcious, fearsome face on the "cowards".
So this contrived wordage serves to increase our fear of the "enemy",at the same time it allows us to deny that fear. By placing our nameless, faceless, fears on a cowardly enemy we are massaged into a psychospace more amenable to manipulation. It was neccesary in order to "lead" us into war. We are so conditioned, by media advertising and such to respond to the feeling tones of words, that we would of course respond with rage toward "faceless cowards" rather than ponder what "faceless cowards" are.
|
040305
|
