|
| |
th_isn'tension_all_misspel_linguistics
|
|
|
hsg
|
th_isn'tension_all_misspel_linguistics
let_m_e_xpla_in_sane
|
081129
|
| |
... |
|
|
questioner
|
is this way of writing somehow more evocative? is it somehow more poetic?
is this way of writing clearer? is it more accessible to the quasi-literate?
is such a method conducive to effective communication? does it convey ideas otherwise prohibited?
would an adult who gibbered in the semi-coherence of a two-year-old be vigorously received by peers? would the woeful results of so many centuries' ineffective discussions melt into the past were such a dialect adopted by the majority?
just some questions.
|
081129
|
| |
... |
|
|
Lemon_Soda
|
What i love is pretension.
Oh, and mainstream values.
Those are winners.
|
081129
|
| |
... |
|
|
questioner
|
seriously, if an adult approached you babbling cryptically in baby talk, you wouldn't find it super pretensious? how is text any different? yes, hsg can blathe whatever the hell s/he wants, since blather_is_blather, and i am equally entitled to ask these pertinent questions.
|
081129
|
| |
... |
|
|
Lemon_Soda
|
I'm a really bad one to argue the point with on this one. Maybe we can just agree to not care anymore?
|
081129
|
| |
... |
|
|
minnesota_chris
|
a call to apathy! Everyone! to... whatever, dude, whatever!
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
sameolme
|
b less u hsg
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
questioner
|
so on the blathe titled "th_isn'tension_all_misspel_linguistics", no one wants to discuss intentionally misspelt linguistics? thesis, but no antithesis? come on, critical thinkers. let us not behave so inanely.
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
sameolme
|
do nut ha lve the fort etude.
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
sameolme
|
So hsg, what do you consider your most
interesting blathe.
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
Mockery
|
Of IOU, sly quest ion stewed if I cult for them asses.
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
hsg
|
Jason ruiz 5208082518
hey that was pretty close!
I have my own rules though! keep the spelling mostly the same (ie obviously), and the breaking up of part(sly ie) should have contextual reference.
relevance should come first in comparison to spelling.
you can also modify the xpressi on this play so as to say more with words/ fun_et_ics taken in multiple ways:
...context u all refer to...
the old rules of grammar apply but defer to artist i_c s.
e1thEr_OtheR is a particular favorite of mine.
but ambiguity rema in s u_c h phrases because few peopl e xercise the necessary meant_ALL gymnastics to perfectly land its meaning.
Ie, either one or the other. e1thEr_OtheR.
There is a purpose to this art. It is calculated but inherently (and in congruence to its purpose) doesn't ache itself too seriously.
Lafter_all_is_sad_undone,the mind thinks at the speed of electricity which iS LIGHTly slower than lightspeed.
Jkf held the record at 350 spoken words per min.
The limitations of our communication mo de finitely embarrass our potential to both express & understand.
By commun i_c at i on severalayers of complimenting information the speed of the mind can (with diligence) be used to compensate for our current path et i_c language. (if you didn't gethat last one, "pathetic" is superimposed with my suggested solution of a "path", et = and -I see- ie i_c in_fun_it creativity.)
If you were to right a sentence,
If you were to fix it such that it can be undersTOOd on severalevels, the main thing is to enab le vels to by their comparison speak.
Wh...y bother? I see our intelligence collectively increasing faster than th efficiency of our language.
The idea, hear!, is to play. As designed, we'al l earn better that way. blISs my MO st importanthingenuity follows nature's art_official_intelligence.
Pu're GENiUs enthusi_as_mynd.
Your pure (re, as_in born_again) genius is U: enthusiasm as my mind.
The moment one falls into the sick decay of intellect called academics
- thought begins to die.
|
081130
|
| |
... |
|
|
questioner
|
thank you for answering my questions, hsg. i'm not quite as impressed with this "style" as you are, but at least now i appreciate why you appreciate th_isn'tension_all_misspel_linguistics.
|
081201
|
| |
... |
|
|
hsg
|
your welcomeness isn't dependent on whether you appreciate my art.
the word, "play" is justhat -even if I am trying to advance the human_race by playing onwards.
|
081201
|
| |
... |
|
|
questioner
|
well playing with words IS the purpose of blather, is it not? i'd say it is.
|
081202
|
| |
... |
|
|
hsg
|
and to quote from my religion, mustbefunny, i hope this clarifies &/ obscures my purpose:
mustbefunny.org/mfp4.htm#quantum
"Quantum thought
The joke lives on ambiguity, maintaining multiple possibilities. Must be funny is the consciousness of the new_age, the key to heaven_on_earth, or it's a bogus parody of same.
My problem as a serious person is I demand to be certain of the truth in my own mind. This is death to comedy, and violates the principle that there is only one message for me and for others.
Can I maintain both possibilities in my mind? Must be funny is true, and it's a false and funny joke. Both are possible success stories, and the joke comes first. It doesn't have to be true. My life is not ruined if it's only a joke.
The gambler accepts both possibilities, of winning or losing, and believes in winning, though also prepared to be wrong. I'm a gambler with two winning outcomes.
I've been too invested in the truth. I need to embrace the joke possibility, where mbf is just a story, made up for entertainment. If nobody believes it, then my truth is indeed irrelevant, and the joke is everything. As a gambler, I should invest in the joke, believe in the joke, live the joke.
The truth is there as material and ambiguity, but should never prevail, since that would end the joke. The truth can be spun with energy and passion, as fodder for the joke. In that sense my investment in the truth is OK. My own mind now embraces both possibilities, that my message is believable and that it will turn out to be a joke.
What if mbf is believed, with sincere followers, laughed at by the world? Mbf as truth will always be a minority position surrounded by disbelief. Even as truth, it tells us our highest purpose is to play jokes on the world. We also have a self_serving internal corruption joke, where the core players disbelieve and take advantage of the believers."
true_false_funny is mbf's
trip_all_logic.
maintain_both_possibilities as stated above is better stated as maintain_multiple_laughabilities because it doesn't have to be possible or true, just funny.
|
090523
|
| |
... |
|
|
hsg
|
i'm_just_kidding
i don'think humor can
really be a true religion.
|
090530
|
| |
... |
|
|
hsg
|
u_c h
you see "H"
usage
of (such phrases)
|
090530
|
| |
... |
|
|
h|s|g
|
http://www.ted.com/talks/emily_levine_s_theory_of_everything.html
she gets !t
|
100816
|
| |
... |
|
|
h|s|g
|
non op|po sit shun ALL strategies...
http://mustbefunny.org/tff.htm
|
100816
|
