| teats | ||
| Q |
I prefer teats too. Or breasts. It is not an issue of size, but one of usage. Literary usage. |
001001 |
| ... | ||
| grendel |
on he literary note, i guess i'm more partial to "breasts" or maybe eve "bosoms" "teats" seems too much like a purely biological term (and too animal at that) and "tits" does just seem too vulgar...but even that, in some context wouldn't necessarily be wrong |
001001 |
| ... | ||
| jennifer |
amber says: "milk from the devil's teats" |
001001 |
| ... | ||
| Q |
Not that I mind teats for "usage," other than literary usage, provided it is consenually and tenderly, very tenderly. This includes my own, by the way. Never would I consider, or consider referring in public or even intimate private to, a teat as a tit. As far as I've ever been concerned, no teat I've ever been treated to consider in its fleshy fulness has been a tit, regardless of its size or supposed lack thereof. |
001001 |
| ... | ||
| Barrett | Show Me Your Teats! | 001002 |
| ... | ||
| god | let's see some udders! | 051105 |