|
re_alisma
|
it seems to me a good deal to have a pluto in libra, where saturn is exalted (i.e. does pretty good), and then have the pluto square be in capricorn where saturn is a ruler. i would imagine that lessens the squarishness of the square aspect. but there's something kinda fishy about that good deal too. something kinda unfair and maybe leading to a conclusion of why kings are kings and common people are, for whatever reason, of some kind of non-royal character. some pretty serious discrimination, in other words. or maybe this points to situation where pluto doesn't seem quite the pluto it would be without saturn there to structure it. not quite the chaos you signed up for. or, perhaps the libra pluto then dominates by over-structuring everything.
could be that whatever it is has already been happening/will keep happening for a little while to come.
i can't say that i get it, really, but it does seem like a good deal, just somewhat corrupt? is that the right word? no blame to all of us Pluto in Libras, though, since i wouldn't have the slightest inkling of the true story behind the way things are. but it might be something to look out for.
|
110218
|
