|
fgvdf
|
Let L be a language. Let L contain abstractions, logical and non logical symbols, and a grammar whereupon the syntaxis in logical and non logical symbols are a metalanguage or a sort of informal set theory and, as will later be noted, provide a secondary metalanguage, that is to be later discussed, and labeled with (e). Let (A), an abstraction be any [category] of [subjects] or that dedition of all the indices of partitions of free variables expected by those subjects, such that an abstraction may suggest a taxonomy amongst those partitions of free variables as a subject and as a sort of natural course that those hiarchies of partitions are factored by(See Rectus Causa) as to assume effigurate wholes called subjects. Let a subject be that nomination of certain partitions or free variables AS,
as those partitions in the subject that are a subgroup to the abstraction as a category, or may be isometrically located to a subgroup within the abstraction, that is a category of all subjections, and that which contains all possible subjects as AS. Let an L-structure contain partitions or free variables that are interpreted by a grammar on logical
and non logical operators that will be called a [circumstance] of those partitions or free variables in the L-structure. Let a subject be a free variable on an L-structure as an encoding of taxonomy of some other free variables obtained by the instrumentality of the category of subjects in A so that we let a subject be which some of who's partitions are found in Asymptotic knowledge, and let all the partitions of free variables in a subject be Symplectic knowledge.
Let a set M of L that is a referrent to the L-Structure of a parenthetical isomorphism of the partitions to that structure contain those free variables in either of the two states:
relavence or irrelavence(R, r). Let r equal the sum of those partitions or free variables of the set M on an L-structure that are not obtained by the subject of the category AS. Let R contain all the partitions
on M as a referrent to an L-structure that are common to S or the subject and otherwise are a subgroup of that subject. Let R be called Asymptotic knowledge; let a subject be called Symplectic knowledge. Let a circumstance, or that circumstance of the subject, C, contain inference rules or the syntactical or set theoretic framework
whereby may or may not be provided for those operations on Mn(Rn) or Mn(rn) or with that Asymptotic knowledge, that is Mn(Rn), or in another set of words, let a circumstance(s) of the relavent kind and only the relavent kind give an account of the metalanguage as it only may implicitly colligate a given subject, such that an ectrotic language may be defined as that language which is most rudimentary and is any metametalanguage on a metalanguage of set theoretic and syntactical frameworks that compartmentalizes a subject S on A to itself in a cirumstance and as a self sufficient and recursive formalization or isomorphism of the definite syntax involved in creating the circumstance amongst some R-variables and is a sort of atomic proposition explaining the circumstance of a predication of S on A in a recursive miniaturization of L structural grammar or inference as for being oriented with the objectlanguage. Let an ectrotic language be a set of free variables, each one, representing a particular and informal circumstance or state of operators on some R variables on a definite subject. Let the circumstance or the inclusion of operators on an Asymptotic knowledge be a relavent predication to a subject. Let a well formed theory exclude all possible r in M in AS. An irrelavent predication cannot relate to a subject in order to predicate that subject, and, therefor, is to be hereafter called The Fallacy Of Irrelavent Predications.
Let any relavent circumstance be that instance whereupon Asymptotic partitions as operated on by their metalanguages, grammar, or syntax, do not violate any propositions of axioms, and will be called Well Behaved if and only if they do not neglect any contingency of their axioms, so that circumstance of Asymptotic partitions, as that is a subgroup to Symplectic partitions, may always be expressed by the subject without incurring the violation of any propositions of axioms, so that a natural sort of harmony may be devised to comparing these sorts of partitions, and what is so in one, in another, so that the truth is that relavent circumstance which does not violate any given propositions of axioms so that whatsoever is operated within the Asymptotic partition may be done so on the subject, given any the same L, thus expanding the category to include implications from the predicate amongst it's subject. So that any (e) variable can be included by the subject it is oriented with, so that, whatever may be implied by the (e) variable may (always) be implied by that subject.
|
071010
|
