|
andru235
|
M: "blah blah blah, now i am quoting cicero, blah blah blah"
P: "i am so pensive"
M: "now i am saying something interesting"
P: "the proof of jc is in the bologna, it is so obvious"
M: "now i am droning on pointlessly"
P: "montaigne is an idiot"
M: "here are thirty references to terrence, yet again"
P: "montaigne is wrong when he says, ..."
M: "now i am being interesting again. i am making good points."
P: "that darn montaigne."
M: "blah blah blah."
P: "now that i have stopped focusing on proving christ and dissing montaigne, i am finally able to record some interesting thoughts. like, montaigne's idiocy proves christs passion."
M: "i read the entirety of the literature available at the alexandrian library when i used that time machine over there. and though i am, it would seem, though not ever to be dismissed formally; *quod*non*loquitur*sempris*, as observed, indelibly, by the irreverent juvenal; if i shall share with you an interesting tidbit i shall follow it with a bore;..."
P: "montaigne is a..."
M: "i shall write a series of gradually lengthening essays on totally random topics, using an idiom that will translate horribly from 16th century french into 21st century american english."
=====================================
andru235 hereby acknowledges that this is a rather lame blathe; yet, having recently read a great deal of them both, and having no other outlet for the relatively unstimulating mental acquisitions therefrom, i am forced at gunpoint to ramble at length, as usual. ======================================
|
050818
|
