|
andru235
|
according to whose standards, anne-girl and dipperwell?!?
the guys i think are good-looking are rarely seen modelling or on the screens. there are almost zero male celebrities who i personally think are notably handsome. usually when i point out persons whom i find to be really good-looking, the company i am with is like "yuck" or "he is *not* cute".
the airbrushed look of the men in 'men's fitness' and the women in 'vogue' (etc) seems creepy, to me...if i wanted to date plastic, i'd go to a sex shop.
blah blah blah, eye of the beholder, but it is so true!
standing in a field of [insert favorite plant], nobody is ever like, "ew, that plant over there is hideous!" every plant is exquisitely beautiful, differences and all. a favorite plant does not diminish the beauty of the rest. comparison becomes quite trivial, does it not? this 'beauty contest' business is one of those things that i take as a sign of warped behavior from overpopulation, sort of like those experiments with mice and stuff. isn't it kind of sad when models - who already are supposed to be so beautiful - get plastic surgery?
physical ugliness is nothing more than a sentiment experienced within the viewer. if someone else thinks you are ugly, it's more of a comment on them than on you. hard to remember that in the moment, though...
personally, i like to think that everyone is guaranteed 10% of their life being perceived by others as beautiful, 10% average, and 10% ugly. the other 70% is one's will or one's fate, etc. or something like that.
anyway, i would be hard-pressed to believe that there is some aspect of you that isn't scintillatingly beautiful. and if it isn't your looks, all the better - then you can bring it with into your next lives.
|
051018
|
