blather
who_you're_will_reveals
hsg There comes a point when being nice to someone else is no longer being nice to someone else but to yourself.
At that point you see that you're inseparable from that person. You will either feel free in giving & receiving (communicating) or feel an immense debt depending on where you have left your will.
091116
...
unhinged 'being nice' doesn't mean allowing people to walk all over you and take whatever they want without giving in return.

the cost_benefit_analysis is that any one person does not deserve an indefinite amount of the heart resources we carry around. dedicating too much of the heart to unappreciative abusive person is abusing yourself.

everything works both ways. sometimes the nicest thing you can do is walk_away.
091117
...
. . 091117
...
hsg Letting someone walk all over you is not being nice. A person giving all of there heart is appropriate. You are a person, too. In this case to do that might involve removing yourself from the situation, etc. The subjects of the actions are irrelevant. Only the actions matter.

nuance_is_not_precision

Limiting the amount of something is_not accuracy or appropriateness.

For instance, if someone is going to buy crack instead of food with $50 you give them it doesn't mean that you give them only ten. If someone beats you it doesn't mean to spend only half as much time with them. It means

A) get yourself to a better place first, then

B) you're heart would tell you to get them help.

See) if that would make you unsafe then you violated "A" against yourself.

I do not dismiss the heart's accuracy in "B", because whether or not you are ABLE TO maintain that type of love without giving into fear or creating hurt and whether or not it is the correct thing to do are two different things.
091117
...
unhinged . 100906