|
re_alisma
|
just my, such as they are, thoughts and reactions, to a writer:
if i read NYer piece right, you vote pisces pluto (future). although you also think scorpio pluto (the present-past) might be more effective. it should be passed along that i totally noted a tinge of anything-but-pluto-virgo thrown in... from what i seem to know, he is trying to differentiate from us candidate plutos aries. and i think he has a point, but it is an archetypal one and one he is definitely allowed because there's not any turning back. also, mars on the south node can be really difficult to own, and also indicates that this might have happened before. (i also have such a signature) so pluto scorpio is also a very good choice and one where he would be forced to learn dependence on people who are stronger and more stable than him (because scorpio's intensity would be swinging around hellaciously, given the background).... i don't know i think you shouldn't let what he did/what happened be also that mortal blow to any of the strengths of love and friendship that have already existed.... he might actually be really grateful (and, given the givens, i think there's a good case that he is...)
but, on the other hand, he could surely be a good teacher, but i don't think/am not aware that he had the ego-resources to prove himself on that particular path.
thus i also change my vote. why do i even get a vote? holy shitstorms, you shouldn't even be tempting yourself into wanting to know. you should stand firm. so -pluto pisces-, if that pleases. (with a possible pluto sag.) and if it wants to turn to pluto scorpio, i wouldn't put up a red flag, but i would wish him a lot a LOT of genuine support.
lots of people "got" "the right stuff" but this can get pretty ugly sometimes. (and maybe i mean the whole the Western World here)
so i hope i'm being helpful like i always hope. i hope this doesn't sound like i'm at all disagreeing or being meddlesome in something i know nothing about. i think all it is is i have a key or whatever that fits what it happens to fit. it would be wrong to just take this as some story for my entertainment.... i'm not even really like that.
love, from, the "utterly wayward, guilty, and tortured by what could've been" and "reincarnationally obsessed as a direct result of former perpetual pathological disappointment and otherwise fairly ingrained reinforced lazy but overly questionful despair" and also a "that was so wrong" person. not to mention "permanently screwed up by a prescription"
p.s. i can read anything into anything, if i am morally compulsed into it... it's not a matter of prurient interest, but that questioning potential guiltiness on my part. also, i seem to think i can skip all the parts i have no insurance to cover... unfortunately, i do have the insurance to read the novel that came out last year, and read it pretty properly.... but i say "unfortunately" because this is unlike most lit. people, with the current standings the way they are, as far as i can gauge the field. which is not necessarily very well.
p.p.s. YES!
|
110414
|
